(Source: Consumers Union of US Inc) Fuel Economy, Acceleration No Better than in Conventional Powertrains YONKERS, NY - Although small turbocharged engines are marketed as delivering the power of a large engine, with the fuel economy of a smaller one, Consumer Reports tests have found that they often fall short of expectations. Many turbocharged cars tested by CR have slower acceleration and no better fuel economy than the models with bigger conventional engines. "While these engines may look better on paper with impressive EPA numbers, in reality they are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines," said Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for...
0 Responses to Consumer Reports Tests Find Many Small Turbo Engines Fall Short On Fuel Economy (Consumers Union of US Inc)